1. Brysbaert M., Warriner A. B., & Kuperman V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911.
  2. Brysbaert M., Stevens M., De Deyne S., Voorspoels W., & Storms G. (2014). Norms of age of acquisi- tion and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. Acta Psychologica, 150, 80–84.
  3. Xu Xu, Li Jiayin. (2020). Concreteness/ abstractness ratings for two-character Chinese words in MELD-SCH. PLoS ONE 15(6).
  4. Bonin P., Meot A., & Bugaiska A. (2018). Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times. Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 2366–2387.
  5. Lahl O., Göritz A. S., Pietrowsky R., & Rosenberg J. (2009). Using the World-Wide web to obtain large- scale word norms: 190,212 ratings on a set of 2,654 German nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 41 (1), 13–19.
  6. Montefinese M., Ambrosini E., Fairfield B., & Mammarella N. (2014). The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) for Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 887–903.
  7. Guasch M., Ferre P., & Fraga I. (2016). Spanish norms for affective and lexico-semantic variables for 1,400 words. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1358–1369.
  8. Soares A. P., Costa A. S., Machado J., Comesaña M., & Oliveira H. M. (2017). The Minho Word Pool: Norms for imageability, concreteness, and subjective frequency for 3,800 Portuguese words. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1065–1081.
  9. Imbir K. K. (2016). Affective Norms for 4900 Polish Words Reload (ANPW_R): Assessments for valence, arousal, dominance, origin, significance, concreteness, imageability and, age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JUL), 1–18.
  10. Coso B., Guasch M., Ferre P., & Hinojosa J. A. (2019). Affective and concreteness norms for 3,022 Croatian words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 72(9), 2302–2312.
  11. Sianipar A., van Groenestijn P., & Dijkstra T. (2016). Affective meaning, concreteness, and subjective frequency norms for Indonesian words. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(DEC).
  12. Aedmaa E. (2019). Detecting compositionality of Estonian particle verbs with statistical and linguistic methods. Ph.D thesis, University of Tartu.
  13. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  14. Schwanenflugel, P.J., & Shoben, E.J. (1983).Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82-102.
  15. Bocanegra Y., Garcı´a A. M., Lopera F., Pineda D., Baena A., Ospina P., et al. (2017). Unspeakable motion: Selective action-verb impairments in Parkinson’s disease patients without mild cognitive impairment. Brain and Language, 168, 37–46.
  16. Smirnova D., Clark M., Jablensky A., & Badcock J. C. (2017). Action (verb) fluency deficits in schizo- phrenia spectrum disorders: linking language, cognition and interpersonal functioning. Psychiatry Research, 257(May), 203–211.
  17. Catricalà E., Della Rosa P. A., Plebani V., Vigliocco G., & Cappa S. F. (2014). Abstract and concrete categories? Evidences from neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropsychologia, 64, 271–281.
  18. Joubert S., Vallet G. T., Montembeault M., Boukadi M., Wilson M. A., Laforce R. J., et al. (2017). Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer’s disease: A behavioral and neuroimaging study. Brain and Language, 170, 93–102.
  19. Köper M., Schulte im Walde S. (2016). Automatically generated affective norms of abstractness, arousal, imageability and valence for 350 000 German lemmas. Proceedings ofthe Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
  20. Paivio A. (1965). Abstractness, imagery, and meaningfulness in paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4-1, 32-38.
  21. Richardson J. (1976). Imageability and concreteness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7-5, 429-431.